[cmaster-next] stable/2.0 close-down

Lou Berger lberger at labn.net
Wed Dec 7 12:28:47 EST 2016


is vtysh not building a known issue?

../lib/.libs/libzebra.a(command.o):(.data.rel.local+0xf00): multiple
definition of `banner_motd_file_cmd'
vtysh_user.o:(.data.rel.local+0x0): first defined here
../lib/.libs/libzebra.a(if.o):(.data.rel.local+0x0): multiple definition
of `interface_desc_cmd'
vtysh.o:(.data.rel.local+0x19e0): first defined here
../lib/.libs/libzebra.a(if.o):(.data.rel.local+0x40): multiple
definition of `no_interface_desc_cmd'
vtysh.o:(.data.rel.local+0x1a20): first defined here
../lib/.libs/libzebra.a(routemap.o):(.data.rel.local+0x0): multiple
definition of `route_map_cmd'
vtysh.o:(.data.rel.local+0x1060): first defined here
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status


On 12/7/2016 12:10 PM, Donald Sharp wrote:
> stable/2.0 if it's a bug fix
>
> master if new feature
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Lou Berger <lberger at labn.net> wrote:
>> so what should patches go against now, 2.0 or master?
>>
>>
>> On 12/7/2016 7:12 AM, Donald Sharp wrote:
>>> I am fine with this.  David?
>>>
>>> donald
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Martin Winter
>>> <mwinter at opensourcerouting.org> wrote:
>>>> On 5 Dec 2016, at 7:55, David Lamparter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just merged Renato's RIP & BGP cleanups, which came with a zebra
>>>>> namespace rework/cleanup.
>>>>>
>>>>> This was pretty much exactly at the limit of what I think was still
>>>>> acceptable for a "stable/" branch, but I'd like to progress clamping
>>>>> down on the "allowed impact" of changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Donald & I are in agreement that, for "stable/2.0", there should be:
>>>>> - no new features
>>>> I would really like to get the needed (small) changes added to be able to
>>>> create snap packages.
>>>> Waiting for Renato on the LDP issue/question on this…
>>>>
>>>> Not sure if this is looked as as a change (and if yes: everyone ok?)
>>>>
>>>> - Martin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> - no reworks
>>>>> (Please voice your disagreement if you have any!)
>>>>>
>>>>> On the other hand, please *do* send:
>>>>> - bugfixes in general
>>>>> - bugfixes for regressions
>>>>> - build system fixes
>>>>> - documentation updates
>>>>>
>>>>> However, even bugfixes should hopefully get smaller and smaller now.  We
>>>>> need to make sure the limes converges towards a release :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cmaster-next mailing list
>>>>> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
>>>>> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cmaster-next mailing list
>>>> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
>>>> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cmaster-next mailing list
>>> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
>>> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cmaster-next mailing list
>> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
>> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next





More information about the dev mailing list